Category Archives: Infamous

Please Keep Being Stupid

I’ve decided something: In some games, I want the voice acting to be bad, I want the environments to be listlessly unbelievable, and I want all the characters to be two-dimensional, stupid and annoying. Just let them stay that way, please.

Nope, not going crazy. First of all, in my latest Kotaku feature, I explain how the wildly fantastic Infamous 2 helped me loosen up a little and learn to be the bad guy.
I’ve always been kind of uncomfortable with pointless violence in video games. Not because I think it makes people violent, or because I think it’s immoral, or because I think it’s “making a statement” of any kind on the real world. It’s just because, when I think of all of the possibilities in interactive entertainment, and the incredible things we can do with games — it’s a way to play, something fundamental to human nature, that can’t be emulated in any other medium — it’s always just kind of seemed weird to me that all we want to do is shoot things. Shoot people.
In that context, the content out there and the way some people play often perplexes me, even occasionally grosses me out. I feel uncomfortable with games that look too much like real war, for example. I dislike that developers sometimes utilize sensitive real-world imagery or events to create “impact” for their shallow, repetitive, cheez-ball cover shooters. Like, if you’re going to leverage real horrific imagery, real suffering, at least do something creative with it.
Right now, though, for once, I am wrecking the shit out of New Marais. I am a little bummed at how far my Serious-Critic thinking cap has taken me from that kind of pure, mindless joy that can keep you playing video games for hours.
These days, when I write, I feel responsible for encouraging people to ask for more than what we’ve got, to create more than what there is. But I used to love that pure chaos, the freedom to wreak havok. Loved it about Grand Theft Auto games, too, far more than the ponderous storylines or the missions, most of which I would avoid or let someone else play for me. Until the fourth one. It took itself too seriously.
Then it kind of hit me. In order for unadulterated destruction and killing sprees in games to be fun, it has to be funny.
Its context must be so absurd that you can’t possibly take it seriously even if you’re trying. In Vice City, I, advocate of respect for women in games, passionate evangelist for games as more-than-toys, blah blah blah, was “that player” — yes, the one who would beat up a prostitute to get my money back, as the old adage goes. I mean, I literally did that.
Because Vice City was flipping hilarious. It was a perfect illustration of absurdist Miami excess, an excellent satire of what was “cool” in the 1980s, and its humor was, very wisely, an indictment of an entire culture and era.
I mean, do I feel awesome explaining to my non-gamer friends about how I had fun running over everyone whose outfit I thought was too tacky? Is that what I want them to think of when they think of video games? Probably not, because they would then glaze over in the middle of my “satire… indictment… so canny” whatever apologia that I break out whenever I talk about GTA.
And I would be bummed if every game were like that. But Infamous 2 — granted, much less crude and overt in its opportunities for violence than GTA — is reminding me that it’s okay if some games are just there to pretty much let me explode buildings and cars and people and whatever.
Infamous 2 is not a smart game. I have been playing it every free minute I get for the past four days, and I’ve done a ton of missions and I still don’t really know what the plot is. Something something Ray Spheres, powers, this lady, a different lady, science, powers, a guy named Bertrand, powers and powers, that’s about all I got. Cole McGrath is such a douchey cliche that he has to be less annoying as a bad guy than as Mr. Hero Helperton. The voice acting makes me climb the walls (although I do go for that gravelly-type voice Cole has).
The citizens of New Marais dodder around awkwardly like weird little scarecrows, wandering into one another and into firefights; I’m in the center of town throwing vehicles at some giant monster and the cars continue driving around, beeping at me because I’m standing in their way. They say stupid things, or sometimes they just run around in screaming hysterics.
But the game world — you know, the things I need to climb on and jump off of — is beautifully made. The game feels brilliant. All the important stuff is perfect, and everything else should stay just the way it is. Because if it were less funny and more real, maybe I wouldn’t feel so awesome about ripping it all apart.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going back to massacring as many civilians as possible to evolve my rank from “Outlaw” to “Infamous.” I mean, that’s what the game is called, so it seems like that’s what I ought to do.

Cole, Spyro And The Jerk Trend


I recently interviewed Insomniac’s Ted Price at Gamasutra, and I also did a profile of him for an upcoming issue of Edge. Next issue? I’m kind of not sure, actually, because when I write for print magazines lead times are long and I have trouble keeping track. I send in my work and some time later you guys tell me on Twitter that you liked my article. What would I do without you?

There were portions of the discussion that I didn’t end up using in either interview; among other things, we talked about Spyro, and I asked him about Activision’s multimedia toy project, Skylanders, that stars a tougher, scalier version of the little dragon that seems more likely to jive with its target audience — today’s tweens, presumably — than the friendly spark-puffing purple guy of yore.
Price, who is one of the more pleasant executives I’ve ever interviewed, told me he likes Activision’s take on Spyro — “Boy, Spyro has changed!” he laughed.
For Insomniac, Spyro was an effort to diversify after Disruptor, the company’s debut game, which had been a first-person shooter capitalizing on the Doom trend. The studio, which has now been around for 17 years, was relatively young at the time, and still defining its flavor, but even with Spyro the team was discovering that it liked unusual weapons, as in all of the dragon’s different breath abilities.
The mascot platformer genre was in its heyday, if you remember. It wasn’t just Sega and Nintendo that chose characters to represent themselves in Sonic and Mario — almost every studio was trying to pin down a cute-but-cool animal buddy that could represent it. It was the 1990s, and it was important to be “radical”, in the 1990s sense of the word, which meant your mascot had to be cute and appealing, but he also had to have “attitude.”
“There was always that tension within the studio, a good tension, about who Spyro should be,” Price told me. “We started out with a Spyro that was kind of cocky and a jerk… we found the fans didn’t necessarily appreciate the cocky nature, and it made him a less endearing character.”
In other words, it was possible to take that “attitude” too far. These days, although Insomniac is still successful with Ratchet games, mascots in general are fewer and further between, and probably for good business reason, as Sega’s numerous off-the-mark attempts to resurrect the Sonic brand have demonstrated.
Recently I have played two video games back to back where the protagonist is a cocky jerk — and they even have the same name, Cole (L.A. Noire and Infamous 2, to be specific). Is “cocky armed jerk” the game industry’s new “mascot character?” I certainly think so. I even find hometown-hero type Nathan Drake to be a little bit of a dick, but I think I might be in a minority here.
But in a sense, I think we’re seeing the same bell curve trend happening with our modern protagonists that touched the mascot action genre in the 1990s. In an effort to answer our cries for something more interesting than the silent space marine, games are giving us all kinds of “tortured, complex” dudes, arrogant bastards who don’t have to be a “good guy” to win. Maybe they’re even setting themselves up to be hoist by their own petards, because those are apparently themes that show games fans how modern and edgy our narratives are.
But Price was correct: After a while in the 1990s, we became turned off not only by the glut of sameness in the mascot genre, but even more by the “attitude” that was supposed to make those animal characters so cool. I think the reason the mascot genre became less relevant wasn’t necessarily because we were oversaturated with the format or because we were tired of that type of game mechanic and level design: I think we stopped liking that type of hero.
When’s the last time you played as someone you found truly endearing? How many more jerks, named Cole or otherwise, do I have to play as this year? Do you guys notice this as well, and are you bothered by it? If so, what do you think historical patterns indicate might be coming next?
In unrelated news, it is Friday, this weekend is Northside Festival and I’m going to see Woods tonight, one of my absolute favorites. This weekend is also exciting because my friends’ band Quiet Loudly are playing with Holy Spirits, whom I also love. Holy Spirits just did a lovely cream-and-gold vinyl split 12″ with Mutual Benefit; you can listen to it on Bandcamp and I highly recommend you do! (Substitute all these links for the usual ‘Today’s Good Song’ and you come out ahead!)
In honor of festival weekend I’ve written The Different Types of Drunk You Can Be at Thought Catalog. I’m a jerk. And now we’re back on topic.